Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s recent ventures have sparked renewed criticism, even from unlikely sources like The Cut, a publication previously sympathetic to the couple. This criticism signals a turning point in public perception, with ongoing scrutiny of their efforts to establish themselves outside royal life.
Failed Media Ventures
The backlash from The Cut comes amidst a string of setbacks in Harry and Meghan’s media projects:
- Spotify Deal and Archetypes: Meghan’s Archetypes podcast, once a flagship project, faced significant criticism and underwhelming engagement. After the termination of their multi-million-dollar Spotify deal, Spotify executive Bill Simmons publicly labeled the Sussexes as “grifters,” a cutting blow to their credibility.
- Netflix’s Polo: The Sussexes’ latest Netflix docuseries, Polo, has been met with scathing reviews. Critics have panned the show for being “dull” and overly focused on a niche subject with limited appearances from Harry and Meghan themselves. Jane Fryer’s one-star review and Danielle Cohen’s assessment of the project as “tortured” echo the general sentiment that the couple has struggled to produce content that resonates with audiences.
The Fallout from The Cut
The Cut, part of New York Magazine, previously portrayed Meghan sympathetically in a 2022 profile, where the Duchess of Sussex shared controversial insights about the royal family. However, the latest article by Danielle Cohen, titled “Harry and Meghan’s Projects Can’t Stop Flopping,” marks a stark shift in tone.
Cohen’s critique highlights:
- Overpromised, Underwhelming Output: The couple’s grand ambitions, from Spotify to Netflix, have repeatedly fallen short. Their content has been described as overly indulgent and lacking in broad appeal.
- Polo Docuseries: Cohen drew comparisons between Polo and Meghan’s failed “American Riviera Orchard” project, describing both as destined for failure due to their inability to connect with audiences.
Meghan’s Narrative of Victimhood
Meghan’s 2022 The Cut interview stirred controversy for its candid remarks about the royal family and the challenges she faced as a royal. While it served to promote Archetypes, the discussion veered into sensitive territory, including:
- Allegations of Racism: Meghan referenced the British press using racial slurs against her children, though these claims were met with skepticism by critics who noted the lack of concrete evidence.
- Royal Hierarchy Criticism: Meghan suggested her and Harry’s push for financial independence “upset the hierarchy,” portraying their departure from royal duties as a bold act of defiance.
Public Perception and Challenges Ahead
The Sussexes now face increasing scrutiny over their inability to produce compelling content, with both critics and supporters questioning their strategy:
- Authenticity in Question: Critics argue that their projects appear self-serving, with little meaningful impact.
- Audience Disconnection: With their attempts to monetize their royal connection faltering, the couple has struggled to carve out a distinct and relatable identity in the public eye.
If Harry and Meghan aim to regain credibility and relevance, they may need to recalibrate their approach, focusing on projects with authentic storytelling and genuine resonance rather than relying on their royal cachet.
